Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0367320120230020069
Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
2012 Volume.23 No. 2 p.69 ~ p.75
Teachers¡¯ Recognition of Victims of School Bullying Using Data from the Adolescents¡¯ Mental Health and Problem Behavior Screening Questionnaire-II Standardization Study in Korea
Hwang Jun-Won

Bhang Soo-Young
Yoo Han-Ik
Kim Ji-Hoon
Kim Bong-Seog
Ahn Dong-Hyun
Suh Dong-Soo
Cho Soo-Churl
Bahn Geon-Ho
Lee Young-Sik
Abstract
Objectives : The current study was conducted in order to investigate teachers¡¯ recognition of school bullying using a nationwide database of adolescents in middle and high school in Korea.

Methods : Students in the 7th to 12th grades at 23 secondary schools participated in the current study during the fall of 2009. Subjects completed the self-report form of the Adolescent Mental Health and Problem Behavior Screening Questionnaire-II (AMPQ-II) and Symptom Checklist-90 Revised (SCL-90-R). In addition, relevant teachers used the teachers¡¯ rating scale of the AMPQ-II to report their students¡¯ status. Differences in the number of bullied students between teachers¡¯ recognition and students¡¯ report were explored.

Results : A total of 2270 subjects provided relevant responses to the questionnaire. While the one-month prevalence of victimization according to students¡¯ self-reports was 28.9%, the recognized prevalence by teachers was only 10.6%. For prediction of the presence of school bullying according to students¡¯ self reports on the AMPQ-II, item 7 of the teachers¡¯ report on the AMPQ-II showed a sensitivity of 16%, a specificity of 92%, a positive predictability of 44%, a negative predictability of 72%, a false positive rate of 8%, a false negative rate of 84%, and an accuracy of 69%, respectively. No significant differences in subscores of students¡¯ self reports of the AMPQ-II and SCL-90-R were observed between bullied students who were recognized by teachers and those who were not recognized. In stepwise discriminant analysis, classification of teachers¡¯ item 2 and item 7 on the AMPQ-II with respect to school bullying according to students¡¯ reports showed an accuracy of 63.4%. Using this model, 75.2% of non-victimized subjects were classified correctly, while only 35.2% of victimized subjects were classified correctly.

Conclusion : Despite the high prevalence in Korea, teachers¡¯ recognition of school violence among their students remains low. Pre-professional and continuing education to improve teachers¡¯ understanding of school bullying and knowledge of effective classroom-based prevention activities should be encouraged.
KEYWORD
Bullying Victim, Prevalence, Teachers¡¯ Recognition
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø